How tall is rupert grint in cm

In April , it was announced that the couple were expecting their first child together. In May , Groome gave birth to their daughter Kristina. Grint is involved with various charities, having donated items such as clothes to charity auctions, as well as participating in the Wacky Rally in with James and Oliver Phelps , which raised money for Britain's Royal National Lifeboat Institution.

His piece, a painted butterfly, was auctioned on eBay in March On 15 July , the series' sixth instalment, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, was released and set box office records.

Also, Half-Blood Prince remains one of the most positively reviewed entries within the series among film critics, who praised the film's "emotionally satisfying" story, direction, cinematography, visuals and music.

Grint observed a change in Ron in this entry, pointing out that his once insecure, often overshadowed character started to become more secure and even began to show a dark side of himself. The actor found it fun to personify a more emotional Ron. Between and , his work received three nominations, including one win — an Otto Award from the German magazine Bravo.

Grint found shooting this film very different from the Harry Potter films since he had to adjust to doing a dozen scenes per day. Grint's character — Malachy, a worker at Belfast — goes to great lengths to impress his boss's daughter, with whom he is infatuated. This film, like his next project, would involve him playing violent roles.

Despite premiering at the Berlin International Film Festival, the film was initially unable to find a distributor. An online campaign by Grint's fans was credited with helping to secure a deal for distribution in the UK in Despite the success of the past films, the future of the franchise was put into question as all three lead actors were unsure about signing on to continue their roles for the final two films. However, by March , Grint agreed to return for the last instalments.

For financial and scripting reasons, the last book was divided into two films which were shot back to back, with filming concluding in June After completing the final film he said: "I mean it literally has been my childhood and suddenly it all came down to really just one random scene, with us jumping through a fireplace, and then it was over.

Because suddenly it was all over, just like that. It was really emotional for all of us, realising that we're never going to be doing this again. In , Grint reprised his role for the fourth film in the series — Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.

The adaptation, unlike previous films, explored romantic elements and included more humour. In a interview with IGN, all three lead actors singled out the humour as being a reason for the film's success. This project was directed by Mike Newell. According to the actor, the director was "really loud and not afraid to swear at you, but he was really cool.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, the fifth film in the Harry Potter franchise, was released to cinemas in This entry was directed by a new filmmaker, David Yates , who would continue to direct all of the following movies.

Grint said the laid back director was "really good" and helped keep the material fresh. As the fame of the actor and the series continued, Grint and fellow Harry Potter cast members left imprints of their hands, feet and wands in front of Grauman's Chinese Theater in Hollywood.

Beginning in , Grint began to work outside of the Harry Potter franchise, playing a co-leading role in Thunderpants.

He has had starring roles in Driving Lessons, a dramedy released in , and Cherrybomb, a drama film of limited release in His first film project following the end of the Harry Potter series was the anti-war film, Into the White, in which he has a supporting role.

In , he voiced the character of Josh in Postman Pat: The Movie, and in , he starred in and was executive producer of the television series Snatch, based on the film of the same name. A year later, Grint again starred as Ron in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets , the second instalment of the series. The film opened to positive reviews and critics generally enjoyed the lead actors' performances. Both Los Angeles Times and New York Magazine observed that Grint and his peers had matured between films, with the latter pointing out that Grint had become "more proficient" and said they missed "the amateurish ardour" the actor and Watson carried in Philosopher's Stone.

And I'm beginning to think Rupert doesn't even have two inches on Emma, he may seem to at times, but when she has good posture she is barely an inch shorter than him.

Click Here Like I said, barely an inch, and if she stood up striaght, who knows what would happen. Plus, she has the placement and posture disadvantage. What is up with that head movement? I was going through my brothers things It was only an inch. Dan had over an inch on those, maybe even more because it was a helluva lot thicker than the one inch heel my brother had. Dan put on two inch heels or so and the only way he could look 5'5" to you does everyone look shorter to you?

He's a solid 5'5". I've seen him up close, he's definitely not shorter than 5'5". That picture as your "proof" JK isn't all that good. Rupert has a half inch and is standing behind Emma. Those were pretty large heels too. I think they were more than 2 inches. That looked like they could be closer to 3 inches. They were really large heels. But if you want to play with pictures He is good at standing up as straight as he can and hiding his footwear.

If you were 5'5" you'd do the same. I could be wrong, but they just don't look to be an inch. Of course you do realize that if Rupert is 2 inches taller than Dan by your calculations, and Dan is wearing dress shoes, he'd be 5'6. You don't seem to get that Which seems everyone is pretty much thinking with some of the responses lately. Since you think Rob is God, that was something he said himself. He also said in reference to Dan so it should count for Rupert that he's wearing "height destroying converse".

Maybe a little over that, but definitely at least a half inch. Then there was a bunch of pictures of the trio at the UK premiere, Rupert not even really standing that straight, he was more than just "two inches taller" he was over three inches, and again, Dan was probably standing over 5'6" with dress shoes.

They look to be a good two inches! Rob also said, since you think he's God here, that he believes cm than cm. To refresh your memory: [Editor Rob: for the moment I'm more of the cm range vs cm.

Especially people 5'8" because they've said he's taller than them. Grint is not 'tall' at 5'8. But, after seeing the movies, you would think Grint is rather tall, as he towers over Radcliffe at 5'5. Anyone else think this is sort of funny or odd? These pictures prove umad's point rather than yours. You know as well as I do that Rupert is leaning considerably in that picture.

There are three other pictures where Rupert is just as tall as Tom. Stop it with finding the pictures that prove your point and ignoring the rest. I even put sorry that was me all pictures and three out of four show him at practically the same height. But you chose the one where Rupert is leaning into Tom! And you can tell! Here are the three others where Rupert is standing more straight and practically the same height: 1.

Click Here 2. Click Here 3. Click Here And then of course there is your picture. The only one you grabbed. Never mind that Tom would be 5' Now if all of them but one showed a major difference and Rupert was standing straighter, I'd say, yes, you have a point.

But Rupert is leaning considerably in that pic while the other three he isn't and is just as tall as Tom. And I think everyone here can see that. Why are you SO insistant that Rupert can only be 5'7"?

Why do you want him to be that height? It's scary how much you want him to be 5'7" or shorter. So Rob, since 6'3" wants you to downgrade Rupert to 5'7" maximum, I want you to upgrade Rupert to 5'9" maximum because, well, apparently in 6'3"s mind we can demand you do that. He's not seriously saying Laura wasn't wearing heels! C'mon Anna, as one female to another, can you honestly say any girl would wear shoes like that and they be completely flat?

Most flat shoes will be more comfortable to wear. No toes squished into a tip! You wear shoes like that, you're doing it for a little height advantage. Laura Linney was definitely wearing normal sized heels! Click Here - And her pant leg would not look like that over a regular, flat shoe. It would hang down around the heel! Instead it is out because of an obvious pointed heel!

Which probably made Laura around 5'9". Going with a regular dress shoe giving two inches to the already 5'7" Laura. And look at him in all these pictures with Tom. Click Here Tom is a strong 5'9", something 6'3" has said and insited upon. He's got the shoe advantage wearing dress shoes, and Rupert looks to only be a half inch shorter! That puts Rupert firmly in a 5'9" range. And c'mon Rob, don't you admit that seeing Rupert in person is definitely a better gauge then guessing like 6'3" is doing?

I could understand if it was just me and maybe a few other fans guessing his height. It's not like a few people are out of their mind in guessing height. It's pretty much everyone who has met him. And it's obvious to me, and pretty much everyone, that Rupert has a solid three inches on Dan and Emma at the ceremony in bare feet. But to me he seemed a helluva lot closer to 5'9" then a weak 5'8".

There are several instances where Dan only comes up to Rupert's eyebrows! And given that he does lean into people, puts his head down, etc. No pun intended there! Here's another thing Click Here This looks exactly like the type heel that Rob has up that gives about 2. Rob, you seem to be questioning your own thoughts on putting Rupert at only 5'7. Personally there are too many pictures that show Rupert is a lot taller than 5'7". I try my best to not give photos that look good to me.

But as I said, too many people - including myself - have seen him in person to say he's anything less than 5'8". Maybe 5'10" is a bit much, but a lot of people have put him at around 5'9" or so. Can you show us a photo where you can actually see the sole of her shoe? I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just honestly having trouble seeing the back part of her shoe Isn't it a bit hard to tell because her pants obscure the heel from view?

At least that's what it seems to me Anyway, how tall is she? Does Rupert really look like a 5'8'' guy to you like yourself or does he look more nearer to 5'7'' to you? He really seems to be more like a strong 5'8" maybe even 5'9" though.

Yes, because it's common knowledge that 5'8" minus 5'7. And in these rules of math you are following, is. Have you ever learnt math? Or for that matter "most closest" grammar? How old are you, 5? Anyway, I still find it very hard to believe he is only 2 inches taller than Dan, 3 at the very least. And Maya, that photo is difficult because, if you look closely, the shot is angled in Rupert's advantage, which would make him appear taller than he really is. So, that's why I think he appears slightly taller in that photo.

You wonder why I think she is an inch or more taller than him. That and the fact that she doesn't get towered over by Rupert when she stands next to him, she is neraly as tall as him when she stands up. And JK, I wasn't trying to offend, I just had no idea how you drew those conclusions. But the shoes they wear can obviously delude us all. I mean, he looks easily 3 inches taller than the 5'5"-5'5. But I think Rupert should be upgraded to at least 5'8", he really does look 5'8"-5'8.

By the way, which one is considered the height celebheights is looking for: evening or morning? And just a thought, I am guessing in the interview where Dan said he is "still 5'5", which is so depressing", he may have just said 5'5" because he would have sounded slightly crazy if he would have said "still 5'5.

I think normal people, even height conscious ones such as Daniel Radcliffe, usually round their heights in order to avoid embarrassment. Could this be possible? Furthermore, it's smart to take the stated heights into account, but look at how tall the celebritie looks compared to others as well. And, JK, I just ask again, why do you want Rupert to be only 5'7"? It seems like you, like I sometimes used to do and am trying to stop, are only posting certain photos that are not necessarily the best to compare heights.

They are just the exceptions that somewhat support your point. But to be honest, he doesn't even look 5'7" in those Empire Awards photos.

More like 5'8" compared to David Heyman. I am slightly reassured that you got it from Google as opposed to visiting that site daily. I still think the URL name is quite a laugh though.

Anyway, the picture can't really prove anything about his height though, can it? I really don't think individual shots can be very conclusive because body structure depends so much. Anyway, I must admit, I've never really looked at Rupert because he's been sort of overshadowed by Dan, but he is not terrible looking. Not bad looking at all. I am assuming you are a male if you are 6'3" at least I'd hope so , but why would you look at a site with that title?

He barely looks 5'7'' in this picture maybe more cm. You can't have several other events where Rupert has several inches on his co-stars and then look at one event and insist that they work.

Rupert is well over 5'7". I've seen him in person several times and he is not just 5'7". There are other people who have seen him and insist that 5'9" isn't that far out of the realm of possibility. You are the only one insisting on 5'6. He has at least 4! And I remember proving way back that those Empire Awards pics are weird Then at the ceremony: Click Here and Click Here.

Then of course at the US premiere: Click Here. And like I've said, I've seen Rupert several times in person now. The first was at the GoF premiere and he was taller than me.

I'm normally 5'5" but with shoes on I was 5'6" with the half inch slight advantage with shoe wear. Rupert was not just a half inch taller than me at that point.

He was at least two inches taller than me. He was definitely 5'8" during GoF or what Rob has him listed at now. And when I saw him for OotP - three times - he was not anything under 5'8". He was 5'8. This is the general concensus amongst fans too, not just me. Well Rob? You may not think they're weird, but don't you think that other events show that the Empire Award pics probably aren't the best ones to look at considering that other recent events show a much larger gap between Rupert and his co-stars?

I never go by them, because they were the oddest pics on the planet. Because Rupert has several inches on Dan all other times. There are pics of them, bare feet, and Dan is looking right at Rupert and the top of his head is only at his eyebrows and they have similiar posture.

So something weird went on with those Empire Awards. As I said, the empire awards are just WEIRD because in all other photos there shows a lot more than an inch and a half to two inches difference.

Btw, I posted a pic of Rupert and Tom that maybe wasn't so good. This one is better because they have better posture, etc. Click Here Oh, if Rupert is only 5'6. Click Here They're both leaning their heads in, so I don't think that'll matter much. Now, obviously, I can be wrong about the between 5'9" and 5'10" and I'm willing to accept that, but c'mon I don't like them, screeching girls and clamouring, pickpockets.

I was just starting to wonder. Have you read the 7th book yet JK? I do hope you read the books if you are this invested in discovering the true heights of these three Honestly, judging by this photo Emma only looks an inch shorter than Rupert, so, if she were really her claimed 5'6", your 5'7" projection for Rupert could still be fitting and Dan looks his 5'5", although a bit shorter, once again why I wonder if Emma has underestimated herself a bit.

So, I'd guess around 5'5" for Dan, 5'6"-5'6. Rupert and Dan really need to get taller or get some lifts of some sort because, firstly, Harry is supposed to grow a lot between 5 and 6 and, secondly, Ron has always supposed to be tall. Cheese and rice. But once again notice, I have given up on the 5'7" for Emma thus proving that it is no magical mark of anything, I just truly believe, similarily, but also oppositely to JK, that she is taller than she is given credit for.

However, I think the Empire Awards photos are a bit hard to judge with because Rupert seems to be slouching and always standing in back, which makes it hard to tell how much height he really has on Dan.

I reckon some of the new photos are better to judge with, yeah? I'd say Rob has Rupert's height about right. I'm just curious why you want so much for him to be downgraded JK? Is there some underlying hatred that you have for Rupert Grint? He seems like a nice and balanced guy, the only things that annoy me are his shyness and his inability to make better clothing choices i.

I once again have to say that the only one of the trio's heights that should be changed is Emma's and that is to 5'6". But I was just thinking on it, what if Dan really is only 5'4"? That would absolutely mess everything up. That would be awful. I think he's 5'5". Let's hope he is. You can see a little bit of his ear too, Dan is definitely 6 inches shorter than him here. Since Isaacs is 5'11", this puts Dan at 5'5" tops here. Rupert is standing slightly behind the rest of them , but he still looks 5'6" tops compared to Isaacs here, or 5'6.

However, I am pretty sure of one thing - there is no way he has this little height over Dan in reality. Those Hand-and-Foot ceremony pics definitely show over 2 inches difference, both in socks. Now, to add more grist to the mill, Isaacs recently claimed only 5'10" for himself - lol, if that's true, that would make Dan 5'4" tops here unless Isaacs has some major lifts!

There is only 2 inches differences in the photo he posted. You did see him in person - but 5'9" is overestimating him. Ideally, you should have brought someone about 5'8" - 5'9" along with you, and compared that person to Rupert. JK, I agree he's not 5'9", but there are many shots of him looking taller than 5'7" compared to Dan. Rob we need a downgrade to atleast a flat 5'7'' you've got the listing a bit wrong, or have him back to 5'7. I'm just curious. We can't even see their feet, postures, et cetera and therefore we cannot judge heights from it.

The angle is not very good either, it's taken from the side and it looks to be taken from slightly above, making those farther away seem taller. And I'm just going to say that I think photos should only be posted if they are full body shots or if we can see if people are slouching, leaning, et cetera because it's just stupid when horrible photos are posted that differ from nearly every other photo from the event just to make one person look taller than the others.

Is this a good idea? Dan's hair is more wild, spiked up so to speak. Rupert's hair parts in the middle. That is what I mean. You have to find the part of Dan's hair to see where the top of his head is. There is a good four inches between them, and I'm sure of that.

He wasn't even much shorter than Tom Felton in dress shoes, and he was leaning. He was a good 3 inches or so than Dan who was in dress shoes. Yes, I'm quite confident no matter what anyone says on this site Rupert is at least 5'9", but I believe when he actually stands straight he can be taller. He has 3 inches on the 5'5" Dan, but only 2 or less inches on the 5'6"ish Emma. There are other caps from the same ceremony like the first where he looks barely 3 inches taller.

Also, Rupert does not look 5'9" compared to other Harry Potter actors Which is why I'm still saying that Editor Rob's listing of 5'7.

You did see him in person, which is certainly a strong argument - but remember that he would have inches on you anyway, so is it not possible that you overestimated him by an inch? That's very easy to do with people around 3 - 4 inches taller than you. He's taller than 5'7", but I still don't agree with the 5'9" as there is a good deal more evidence showing him to be under 5'9" than around it. The top of Dan's head, without hair, still comes above Rupert's eyebrows.

As I told you, they had 7 inches easy on him in nearly all photos, even with them leaning at least as much as him. I saw the film a few days ago, and in the few scenes of the DA where he was near them, they looked to have 7 inches on him. You did see the promo shot of the entire DA, did'nt you? Rupert looks nowhere near 4 inches taller than Dan there, even accounting for Dan being slightly closer to the camera.

If Dan is 5'5" which I believe he is Rupert is around 5'8", not more. I just think that maybe 5'10" might be wrong, but so is 5'7" and 5'8". And when you see them arm and arm, Rupert bends down. Dan struggles to get his arm around Rupert's shoulders, and you can see Rupert bend down a bit. That may be why the height is still harder to tell. Because this site has middle of the eyes to the top of the head as 4. It may not be exactly 4 inches difference, but it looks pretty damn close to me.

And yes, they are in their socks. They are in socks there, of course??? I realize that they're not always standing perfect, but you can get an idea that Dan - when you don't count his hair - really only comes up to Rupert's eyebrows, and perhaps just below that. Click Here Rupert ain't that tall, but he certainly isn't a weak 5'7". I don't think 5'9" is that hard to swallow either. I think the most you could get Rob up to his 5'8" and seeing as that is Rupert has said I think , that would make sense.

But I have looked at the printing ceremony photos as well and if you look at the differences on the full length shots compared to that shot that you keep posting, they look quite different. And seeing as we know their posture and positions much better in the full length shots, I think that is what we should judge by. The around 6'2" Craig, wearing dress shoes, would be around 6'3". But as I said, it wasn't the easiest thing to look at And I noticed that no one cares about the fan photo.

I guess in everyone's eyes he must be lying. I'll have to get him to come over here All other sites had 5'10", but his agency just recently put it up. And no Anna, they are not all pictures of Emma having an inch on Dan nor barely two inches shorter than Rupert.

I've seen enough of them. Rupert is at least 4 inches taller than his co-stars when they have no shoes on.

They come up around his eyebrows! Click on the other pictures and you'll see the same thing. That is not the only picture, just the best one posture wise. Personally I wish Rob wouldn't put up that interview of his height. Not even a month later he told a news station I can't remember where he was just 5'7" to which they replied, "You look taller than that. Best pics I have seen to judge by are the hand and foot print ceremony.

When you google 'rupert grint height' these heights come up I'm just curious how they came to be If they don't want Dan to look small and give him a bit of a lift in his shoe that's fine, but then do the same with Rupert so the height difference remains the same.

Click Here And look at this photo for Dan and Emma Click Here Rupert is obviously ruled out because of his leaning back and posture, but it's good for Dan and Emma because they are both standing up and the angle is direct, as can be seen when you compare the two posters in the background.

And umad80, it would be great to see those photos, but from the barefoot photos I've seen, Rupert looks 5'8", Dan looks 5'5", and Emma looks a very strong 5'6", possibly 5'6. I mean, Emma is literally much taller than Dan when they both take of their shoes. LOL I was there. For Rupert to be that much taller than his co-stars, they'd have to bending tremendously.

They were in their bare feet at that point. You could clearly see that Rupert had several inches on his co-stars the minute they took off their shoes.

Whatever Emma was wearing, it had a heel. I think like the one from the French photocall. And I don't know what is with Dan, but he lost like two inches the minute he took his shoes off.

And I wasn't the only one who noticed that. I need to take some screencaps of my video that I got, but I'll be showing all the photos of when the trio are out of their shoes. When they're all arm and arm, they aren't wearing shoes. Let's face it. Emma and Dan are the exact same height 5'5" and Rupert has at least 4 inches on them both. This photo proves it. It's not a bad angle I'll find a dozen of them to prove that every single one shows the exact same thing.

In my opinion, that is a horrible angle and we cannot even see their feet and if we go off of the other photos Emma is majorly bending down during that bit to make Dan's arm fit around her more comfortably.

Also, there are plenty of other, better, photos where Emma looks an inch taller than Dan and barely 2 inches shorter than Rupert, so I am going to stick with 5'6" for Emma and 5'8" for Rupert, he just looks too short compared to Emma and Dan in the majority of the reliable photos to say anything differently. I would go up to 5'9", but 5'8" seems much more likely unless you consider Emma 5'7" and there is no way you are going to convince Rob of that.

This is when they're in their socks: Click Here Dan has admitted to truly only being 5'5", and Emma is just a touch shorter than him. Whenever you see that "middle of the forehead" thing, you're looking at Emma in heels. You keep counting her height in heels. It is now people. Let's not even go there. He didn't seem that much shorter than the twins. But if his brother said Rupert's 5'11" and even if Rupert were 5'10", that would completely mess everything up because, to be honest, Emma doesn't look much shorter than Rupert.

If Rupert were 5'10", then Emma would come up to barely his eyebrows and, as can be seen at the printing ceremony and the Paris photo call, Emma comes up to about midway on Rupert's forehead.

When they were all barefoot, Rupert had like 4 or so inches on both Emma and Dan. Rupert is a weak 5'10". I agree James is off Was it really necessary to make that comment Rob? They're brothers, he'd know more than you. Oh, antron, c'mon. The last time we saw Rupert and Mark Williams in a scene together, I mean standing side by side, was in GoF and we don't know even know how tall Rupert was then because that was probably sometime in or early when they filmed that scene.

Which I think Rupert was around 5'8. And he wasn't that much shorter than Tom, in dress shoes, at the OotP premiere. They say they are 6'3". They also said that Rupert's brother James said Rupert was 5'11", but I don't even think that.

But it's obvious that standing next to a 6'3" guy, Rupert seems to be maybe a weak 5'10". But you have this one: Click Here and this one: Click Here. Are you blind? If Rupert's 5'7", Dan's 5'3". And a representative of a RG site talked to James Grint his own brother and asked him Rupert's height and he confirmed a 5'11". Close-Minded and it confuses me a bit why he would be so. Ah well though, some people will never change. But I am very willing to believe that Rupert is 5'8.

However, there is no way he can be under 5'8". But if you are advocating this for Rupert, how can you say taht Emma is only 5'5"-5'5. There are just too many photos of her and Rupert from Paris and the Hollywood ceremony that prove that she really is only inches shorter than Rupert.

And they also prove that she is about 1 to 2 inches taller than Daniel, putting her in that 5'6" range. I mean, even with Daniel's poofy hair and Emma's flat hair, she still looks taller than him.

There are just too many photos where she looks 5'6" or more for me to believe that she is still 5'5". And they are Good, nearly Perfect photos that I am speaking of. You will not get much better photos ever. You've got your mind set on your thoughts of his height. Even this site says photos are just guestimates and the best way to tell is by seeing them in person.

I think the least Rupert is is 5'8. His posture isn't as bad as it was, but still, when Rupert stands to his fullest height, he gains about an inch a half or so. But as I said, your mind is stuck on one thing, and there is no changing it, no matter what someone presents as an argument.

Oh, and Dan does look short, but he isn't. He's definitely at least 5'5" because there are Dan fan sites, the owners, they've seen him in person and will confirm the 5'5" to 5'5. And he definitely looks 5'5" to me if not over that. He doesn't seem shorter than me. But Rupert is over 5'7" and I believe he is over 5'8".

How much over 5'8" may still be a mystery, but he's not below it. That I will stake my life on. And when I was face to face with him at GoF two years ago, he was quite a bit taller than me. I was wearing regular shoes vs. I'm 5'5" and I was most likely about 5'6" with shoes, and he was taller than me but at least an inch or so.

So he's definitely taller than 5'7" and most likely taller than 5'8". Watching the movie today, standing with the twins, you can see he comes up to around their eyebrows give or take most likely a bit of take and I know that's not the best gauge, but it shows that the "weak 5'7"" is clearly wrong. I was standing no less than a few feet away from them.

You can see in this video he's got quite a few inches on Dan. Click Here I don't know if it's possible to right click, save as that way I purposely made sure I focused on Dan and Rupert in their stocking feet. You can see there is more than an inch in height difference! Like I said, for Rupert to be "only 5'7" if he's lucky" then Dan would have to be 5'3". You have to see them in person or even watching videos might help. Rupert is definitely a leaner. He leans a lot into other people.

That is why his height tends to fluxate so much. Click Here - this is when they're in their stocking feet. They didn't put their shoes on until after these pics were taken. You can see that Dan and Emma only come up to Rupert's eyebrows. A little below infact. That's suppose be around 4. And I was just going through the stuff, what are you guys talking about with Rupert being shorter than Emma at the Paris premiere? The boy, as I mentioned, was leaning in. Falguni Rahman Jolly 25 Years.

Alyssa FamilyFunPack 15 Years. Alex O'Loughlin 45 Years. Hridaynath Mangeshkar 84 Years. Hillary Clinton 74 Years. James Pickens Jr. Craig Shakespeare 58 Years. Sarekoppa Bangarappa 78 Years. Taylor Baruchel 34 Years. Azad Abul Kalam 55 Years.

Prahlad Chandra Tasa 71 Years. Shailendra Nath Shrivastava 69 Years. Seth MacFarlane 48 Years.